- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:41:36 -0700
- To: david.bolter@gmail.com
- Cc: bringert@google.com, marc.schroeder@dfki.de, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
TTS is *definitely* in scope. David Bolter writes: > Hi all, > > I am actually more interested in TTS than speech recogntion however I > wasn't aware TTS is in scope for this group? Perhaps Dan can clarify. > > cheers, > David > > On 09/09/10 11:56 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Marc Schroeder<marc.schroeder@dfki.de> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> let me try and bring the TTS topic into the discussion. > >> > >> I am the core developer of DFKI's open source MARY TTS platform > >> http://mary.dfki.de/, written in pure Java. Our TTS server provides an HTTP > >> based interface with a simple AJAX user frontend (which you can try at > >> http://mary.dfki.de:59125/); we are currently sending synthesis results via > >> a GET request into an HTML 5<audio> tag, which works (in Firefox 3.5+) but > >> seems suboptimal in some ways. > > I was just going to send out this TTS proposal: > > http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcfg79pz_4gnmp96cz > > > > The basic idea is to add a<tts> element which extends > > HTMLMediaElement (like<audio> and<video> do). I think that it > > addresses most of the points that you bring up, see below. > > > > > >> I think<audio> is suboptimal even for server-side TTS, for the following > >> reasons/requirements: > >> > >> *<audio> provides no temporal structure of the synthesised speech. One > >> feature that you often need is to know the time at which a given word is > >> spoken, e.g., > >> - to highlight the word in a visual rendition of the speech; > >> - to synchronize with other modalities in a multimodal presentation (think > >> of an arrow appearing in a picture when a deictic is used -- "THIS person", > >> or of a talking head, or gesture animation in avatars); > >> - to know when to interrupt (you might not want to cut off the speech in > >> the middle of a sentence) > > The web app is notified when SSML<mark> events are reached (using the > > HTMLMediaElement timeupdate event). > > > > > >> * For longer stretches of spoken output, it is not obvious to me how to do > >> "streaming" with an<audio> tag. Let's say a TTS can process one sentence at > >> a time, and is requested to read an email consisting of three paragraphs. At > >> the moment we would have to render the full email on the server before > >> sending the result, which prolongs time-to-audio much more than necessary, > >> for a simple transport/scheduling reason: IIRC, we need to indicate the > >> Content-Length when sending the response, or else the audio wouldn't be > >> played... > > While this is outside the scope of the proposal (since the proposal > > doesn't specify how the browser talks to the synthesizer), streaming > > from a server-side synthesizer can be done with chunked transfer > > encoding. > > > > > >> * There are certain properties of speech output that could be provided in an > >> API, such as gender of the voice, language of the text to be spoken, > >> preferred pronounciations, etc. -- of course SSML comes to mind > >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis11/ -- congratulations for reaching > >> Recommendation status, Dan!) > > SSML documents can be used as the source in<tts>, so all these > > parameters are supported. > > > > > >> BTW, I have seen a number of emails on the whatwg list and here taking an a > >> priori stance regarding the question whether ASR (and TTS) would happen in > >> the browser ("user agent", you guys seem to call it) or on the server. I > >> don't think the choice is a priori clear, I am sure there are good use cases > >> for either choice. The question is whether there is a way to cater for both > >> in an HTML speech API... > > The proposal leaves the choice of client or server synthesis > > completely up to the browser. The web app just provides the text or > > SSML to synthesize. The browser may even use both client- and > > server-side synthesis, for example using a server-side synthesizer for > > languages that the client-side one doesn't support, or using a simple > > client-side synthesizer as a fallback if the network connection fails. > > > > > -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 16:42:10 UTC