- From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:53:55 -0500
- To: "'Bjorn Bringert'" <bringert@google.com>, "'Dan Burnett'" <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Cc: <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
When I suggested this requirement, I was thinking about if the eventual proposal supports some kind of an attribute on "<input>" like "type=speech", that attribute should be interpreted as allowing speech, not requiring it. If it meant that speech was required, then the application would force people to speak to use it. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:37 PM > To: Dan Burnett > Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org > Subject: Re: R23. Speech as an input on any application should be able to be > optional > > This doesn't seem like a requirement on the API, but a requirement on > how application authors use it. > > /Bjorn > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> > wrote: > > Group, > > > > This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our > > ranking approach [1]. > > > > This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and > > opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 23 [2]. > > > > Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. Outstanding > > points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference. > > > > -- dan > > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg- > htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att- > 0001/speech.html#r23 > > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham > Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 19:54:34 UTC