- From: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:04:46 +0000
- To: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Cc: Olli@pettay.fi, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
I don't think that we have to address what the user interface should be. That should be up to user agent implementors. In the eventual spec, we just need to specify what web apps can expect, and what minimum features user agents must provide. Maybe an alternative phrasing would be: "Web applications should not be forced to provide their own visual interface for controlling speech recognition." /Bjorn On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com> wrote: > I think Olli's wording is a little clearer. > I think we need something like this, especially in the development phase. However, I think there's a danger that we might get bogged down in "high quality", especially if we think that "high quality" includes "visually appealing". I think "informative" and "usable" would be better descriptions. > Also, a high-quality, or even just informative and usable, default visual interface will need to be different for different devices, depending on screen size, keyboard, touchscreen vs. mouse, availability of physical buttons, etc. We can't address every device, so should we just focus on one or two major devices, like desktop browser and "generic small-screen device"? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Olli Pettay >> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:02 AM >> To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org >> Subject: Re: R26. There should exist a high quality default speech recognition >> visual user interface. >> >> On 11/16/2010 12:52 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: >> > Keep. >> > >> >> I agree. >> Though the wording of the requirement is a bit strange. >> Had to read >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Nov/att- >> 0102/requirements.html#r26 >> to understand it fully. >> >> Could something like this work better: >> "There should exist a high quality default visual user interface for the >> speech recognition." >> >> >> -Olli >> >> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com> >> wrote: >> >> Group, >> >> >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our >> >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and >> >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 26 [2]. >> >> >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding >> >> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference. >> >> >> >> -- dan >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg- >> htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> >> [2] >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att- >> 0001/speech.html#r26 >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- Bjorn Bringert Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 15:05:16 UTC