- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:02:15 +0200
- To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
On 11/16/2010 12:52 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > Keep. > I agree. Though the wording of the requirement is a bit strange. Had to read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Nov/att-0102/requirements.html#r26 to understand it fully. Could something like this work better: "There should exist a high quality default visual user interface for the speech recognition." -Olli > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 26 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. Outstanding >> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r26 >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 11:02:47 UTC