- From: Andy Mauro <Andy.Mauro@nuance.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:54:44 -0400
- To: Satish Sampath <satish@google.com>
- CC: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, <Olli@pettay.fi>, <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
It really boils down to what the default setting is ;) If it's to reject developer requests for particular reco resources then we're likely not in agreement since IMO this will cause apps to not work if a developer uses recognizer specific functionality (which as much as I don't like this, is the way it is today). If the default is to accept developer requests, and a user has to manually modify the setting to use only local resources or an alternate network resource, then I think all our goals are met (security, privacy, app consistency) -Andy > From: Satish Sampath <satish@google.com> > Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:49:51 +0100 > To: Andy Mauro <Andy.Mauro@nuance.com> > Cc: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, <Olli@pettay.fi>, > <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Offline webapps and speech UI > >> I'm more concerned with the loophole that arises that seems to mean that >> browsers can simply use their preferred recognizer all the time irrespective >> of developer choice. > > I don't see that as a loophole, but akin to (2) in your list where the > 'paranoid privacy setting' is 'downloading and using a browser which > uses my preferred recognizer'. > > - Satish
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:55:18 UTC