- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:49:52 +0000
- To: "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <22CD592CCD76414085591204EB19F4E809A41731@TK5EX14MBXC201.redmond.corp.microsoft.>
I've updated the latest requirements draft (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/htmlspeech/live/draft-20101223-requirements.html) which includes the 7 new requirements from the last teleconference (http://www.w3.org/2010/12/16-htmlspeech-minutes.html), moves the old section 3 into an Appendix (and removes the strikeout), and tries to start the organization of the first pass requirements. I've provided a two level organization structure that makes sense to me in the table of contents (First: Is it a feature requirement? An ease of authoring requirement? Or a security/privacy requirement?; Second: Does it apply to speech services [both reco and synth]? Does it apply to just reco? Does it apply to just synth?) that helps to provide some structure to the document. I haven't reordered requirements inside of these levels (I.e., putting ones that are similar near each other beyond original order) and I haven't renamed/renumbered the requirements yet nor reordered the content. I'm holding off on renaming as it makes it harder to track changes and also renaming and reordering the content takes a decent chunk of time and I want to make sure we like this ordering before committing to that. Probably a good topic for our first January call. Reminder that if any requirement is not currently clear enough to prioritize to send clarification text or supplemental text to the list. Hope everyone has a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 23:50:27 UTC