- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:08 -0500
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
It appears that we consensus to replace R2 with the two new requirements below from Bjorn. We will confirm this on today's teleconference. -- dan On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > We already have a requirement that it should be possible to specify a > grammar. R2 implies two additional things: > > 1. Recognition without specifying a grammar should be possible. (i.e. > "free-form" recognition) > > 2. Applications should be able to specify the grammar (or lack > thereof) separately for each recognition. > > I suggest that we split R2 into these two new requirements. > > /Bjorn > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> > wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize >> based on our >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >> and >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 2 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding >> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming >> teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r2 > > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham > Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:39:02 UTC