- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:37:47 -0500
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Cc: Olli@pettay.fi, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
It appears that we have consensus to keep this requirement. We will confirm this in today's teleconference. -- dan On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > I agree with everything Olli said. > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Olli Pettay > <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> Isn't this already (at least partially) covered by the requirement to >> be able to give parameters to speech engines and requirement to >> support >> EMMA or something similar. >> >> But anyway, I think we should keep this requirement. >> >> >> -Olli >> >> >> >> On 11/22/2010 10:07 AM, Dan Burnett wrote: >>> >>> Group, >>> >>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize >>> based on >>> our ranking approach [1]. >>> >>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >>> and >>> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 25 [2]. >>> >>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an >>> upcoming >>> teleconference. >>> >>> -- dan >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >>> [2] >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r25 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham > Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902 >
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:38:31 UTC