- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:10:05 +0100
- To: Mike Liebhold <mnl@well.com>
- CC: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com>, public-xg-geo@w3.org, member-xg-geo@w3.org
Mike Liebhold wrote: > Hello Joshua, > > I'll be in a meeting all-day on Thursday, so will miss the > teleconference/chat. I am still hoping that the geo xg will focus on > influencing W3C members ( eg. Yahoo, et. al. )to rationalize geoRSS > simple with OGC wgs84 geoRSS. > > It's a bit suprising to read that the geo xg is a wrap, given the > unfinished business harmonizing geoRSS versions. I hope that the group > will continue until this modest goal is achieved. I'm afraid I also can't make it, will be in transit back from Copenhagen at that time. As (for SW Interest Group) editor of http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/ and the wgs84-based little RDF namespace there, am interested to hear of any proposed updates. What's the status of "neogeo"? How far have things gotten with http://mapbureau.com/neogeo/neogeo.owl ? cheers, Dan
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 22:11:36 UTC