- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:09:18 +0200
- To: 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr>
- Cc: Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>, elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-xg-federatedsocialweb <public-xg-federatedsocialweb@w3.org>
On 26 August 2011 15:32, 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr> wrote: > Are there proposed group related FSW ? > > I'm not sure that new community group would be suitable than FSW XG. > > Current Community Groups: http://www.w3.org/community/groups/ > Proposed Groups : http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/ > Comparisons of Group Types : http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/compare/ As you say, the current "Incubator Group" is just fine. However my understanding is that W3C expects community groups to eventually replace the Incubator mechanism. So in a few years, there will only be Community Groups, not CGs + XGs. Whether current incubators want to, or need to, transition is a separate question, I believe. Incubator groups have short-term charters. Dan ps. I am not sure what the plan is re access to teleconference bridge (Zakim) for CGs. Some (not all?) XGs currently use teleconferences...
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 14:09:55 UTC