- From: Marc Schroeder <schroed@dfki.de>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:16:04 +0200
- To: Idoia Zearreta <icearreta001@ikasle.ehu.es>
- CC: EMOXG-public <public-xg-emotion@w3.org>
Hi, we had a long and intense meeting today, and you will get the various pieces of the minutes in the next days. I think we made good progress. Let me just answer this one point now, as it is scientifically interesting and quickly answered: Idoia Zearreta schrieb: > Core 7 - Agree with Ian again, we are not sure about a separate > intensity tag. Regarding with respect to dimensional classification, > isn't it enough using values of different scales? We think the arousal > scale is closely related to intensity. It might be useful for emotion > categories. Actually, we are not sure about this point. I see two reasons for keeping intensity as a separate element, one scientific, the other one practical. The scientific reason is that some models exist which associate a given position in three-dimensional PAD space (pleasure-arousal-dominance, from Mehrabian) with an intensity. The example I am thinking of right now is Patrick Gebhard's ALMA model: an emotion is triggered by a certain event; it is represented as a category but also has a (fixed) position in PAD space; and its intensity diminishes over time. He actually has a graphical display of this -- you see a red circle with diminishing radius at the given position of the PAD space. (it is freely available, see http://www.dfki.de/~gebhard/alma/) So that means, intensity is not specific to categories. The second reason is a practical one: By having intensity as a separate element, you can indicate a separate confidence for the intensity, independently of the category. The example I had given earlier is this one: <emotion> <intensity value="0.1" confidence="0.8"/> <category set="everyday" name="boredom" confidence="0.1"/> </emotion> This is, we are highly confident that the emotion has a low intensity, but have only a vague guess at what emotion it could be. If intensity was an attribute, you would not be able to express this. So, enough emotion markup for today ;-) Best, Marc -- Dr. Marc Schröder, Senior Researcher at DFKI GmbH Coordinator EU FP7 Project SEMAINE http://www.semaine-project.eu Chair W3C Emotion ML Incubator http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion Portal Editor http://emotion-research.net Team Leader DFKI Speech Group http://mary.dfki.de Project Leader DFG project PAVOQUE http://mary.dfki.de/pavoque Homepage: http://www.dfki.de/~schroed Email: schroed@dfki.de Phone: +49-681-302-5303 Postal address: DFKI GmbH, Campus D3_2, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany -- Official DFKI coordinates: Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 19:17:21 UTC