- From: Ian Wilson <ian@emotionai.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:17:40 -0500
- To: "Marc Schroeder" <schroed@dfki.de>, "Dylan Evans" <evansd66@googlemail.com>
- Cc: "Bill Jarrold" <jarrold@ai.sri.com>, "Catherine Pelachaud" <catherine.pelachaud@inria.fr>, "Burkhardt, Felix" <Felix.Burkhardt@t-systems.com>, "Enrico Zovato" <enrico.zovato@loquendo.com>, "Kostas Karpouzis" <kkarpou@softlab.ece.ntua.gr>, "Nestor Garay" <nestor.garay@ehu.es>, "Idoia Zearreta" <icearreta001@ikasle.ehu.es>, "Christian Peter" <Christian.Peter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de>, public-xg-emotion@w3.org
- Message-Id: <31228.1211984260@orgoo.com>
Dylan, Its interesting in that it is a good case of the need for engineering discipline, looking at the requirement from a high level, abstract or what I think of as an information processing perspective rather than a low level implementational perspective. As an example, an action tendancy of "eat food" would be implementational and specific to systems that (simulate) eating whereas a more informational "consume energy" might be a more useful and wide ranging action. This is a prime area then for a hierachy but assumes we start with something, that would be someones theory. That makes me a little uncomfortable unless there is a widely used theory currently available, for me that would ideally be a neuroscience inspired system. Expression does now seem odd but again it is very implementational, what did we decide on this, my memory is vague? Best, Ian On Wed May 28 2:48 PM , "Dylan Evans" <evansd66@googlemail.com> sent: Hi, I'd be happy to contribute a short discussion of core 5: action tendencies, unless Bill or Ian wants to do this (it was either Bill or Ian who suggested that this be part of the core, I think). There are some interesting difficulties with this requirement. One of them concerns the level at which behaviour should be specified; another is the dependency of action tendencies on the effectors available to the system, which have huge variation. Another is the distinction between action tendencies and expression. For example, is the movement of wizkid's undefinedheadundefined an action tendency or an expression? See http://www.wizkid.info/en/page12.xml Come to think of it, we don't have a category for expressions at all in the core requirements. That seems really odd to me now, given that we have a category for action tendencies. Some robots express emotions by means of different coloured lights, while others do so by means of moving their ears, for example, so it would be good to enable robotic designers the means to register these possibilities in the EML. Dylan On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Marc Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > this email goes to all those who have participated in the preparation and > discussion of the prioritised requirements document [1]. > undefined I think it would be nice to write a short paper on the progress we have made undefined in the EMOXG, for the workshop undefinedEmotion and Computingundefined [2] at the KI2008 > conference. That is a small workshop aimed at promoting discussion, so > bringing in our "2 cents" seems worthwhile. > undefined Deadline is 6 June; target length is 4-8 pages in Springer LNCS format, i.e. > not much space. Tentative title: > > "What is most important for an Emotion Markup Language?" > > The idea would be to report on the result of our priority discussions. A > main section could describe the mandatory requirements in some detail and > the optional ones in less detail; a shorter discussion section could point > out some of the issues that were raised on the mailing list (scales, > intention for state-of-the-art or beyond). > > Who would be willing to help write the paper? Please also suggest which > section you could contribute to. Active participation would be a > precondition for being listed as an author, and we should try to find an > order of authorship that fairly represents the amount of participation (in > the previous discussion and in paper writing). > > Best wishes, > Marc > > > undefined [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-requirements undefined [2] http://www.emotion-and-computing.de/ > > -- undefined Dr. Marc Schröder, Senior Researcher at DFKI GmbH undefined Coordinator EU FP7 Project SEMAINE http://www.semaine-project.eu undefined Chair W3C Emotion ML Incubator http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion undefined Portal Editor http://emotion-research.net undefined Team Leader DFKI Speech Group http://mary.dfki.de undefined Project Leader DFG project PAVOQUE http://mary.dfki.de/pavoque > undefined Homepage: http://www.dfki.de/~schroed undefined Email: schroed@dfki.de > Phone: +49-681-302-5303 undefined Postal address: DFKI GmbH, Campus D3_2, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, D-66123 undefined Saarbrücken, Germany > -- undefined Official DFKI coordinates: undefined Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH undefined Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany undefined Geschaeftsfuehrung: undefined Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) undefined Dr. Walter Olthoff undefined Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes undefined Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 > -- -------------------------------------------- Dr. Dylan Evans Senior Research Scientist Cork Constraint Computation Centre (4C) University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Tel: +353-(0)21-4255408 Fax: +353-(0)21-4255424 Email: d.evans@4c.ucc.ie Web: http://4c.ucc.ie http://www.dylan.org.uk -------------------------------------------- ------- Sent from Orgoo.com - Your communications cockpit!
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 14:18:30 UTC