Re: [EMOXG] Confidence

Bi Polar semantics sounds very complex, do you have an example perhaps?


Marc Schroeder wrote:
> Ian,
>
> Ian Wilson schrieb:
>> I think that is a reasonable solution, as I understand we have:
>>
>> 1. 3 Possible scale values
>>   a. Uni polar, 0.0 to 1.0
>>   b. Bi polar , -1.0 to 1.0
>>   c. Fuzzy semantic, 7 values for example -> None to Extreme
>
> actually, two variants of c, one for unipolar, one for bipolar scales
>
>> 2. We use this schema for all tags with values (where appropriate)
>
> Yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Marc
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 August 2008 12:51:29 UTC