- From: Christian Peter <Christian.Peter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:41 +0100
- To: public-xg-emotion@w3.org
- Message-ID: <45780D31.9000204@igd-r.fraunhofer.de>
Hi, although I'm not a listed UC3 member I somehow slipped in :-) My guest vote on the generic parameters is: yes. Christian -- Ian Wilson schrieb: > Alejandra and All, > > There will be redundancy in the document I think, it is a compilation of > everyones ideas. > What I am hoping we can do is decide what is not required in the document, so we > can cut those items. > > Before the call 12/11 I would like to take a vote of UC3 interested members, > > Question: Should the Emotion Language include a generic mechanism/parameters for > input and output? > > I think this will be the main point for discussion in the call and will > determine what the scope of the language will be. > > My vote - Yes, the language should include some kind of generic input/output > parameters. > > Best, > > Ian > Emotion AI > -- =========================================================== Christian Peter, Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Joachim Jungius Str. 11, 18059 Rostock, Germany Phone: +49 - 381 - 40 24 122; Fax: +49 - 381 - 40 24 199 Email: christian.peter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de ----------------------------------------------------------- Digital signature: you can download the RootCA at http://pki.fhg.de/FhG-CA-Certs/FhG-CA_v2_cert.der more info: http://pki.fraunhofer.de/EN/ ===========================================================
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 12:43:51 UTC