- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:08:05 +0000
- To: public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0903281608r162ea5e8y5ad87d2d572cc33f@mail.gmail.com>
all, there are several other choices of tools and environments I would like to learn how to use knoodl because its a web based option, but other could be tried as well such and wandora for ex, see below, and also http://www.mulgara.org/, and possibily others look forward to considering them ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:01 PM Subject: Re: our vocabulary on Knoodl To: C H <craighubleyca@yahoo.com> Craig I mean why dont you start something on Wandora? ... it would be great if you could do a version of the EIIF vocab on Wandora p On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:54 PM, C H <craighubleyca@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > why dont you start putting something up there? I cant do > everything. ..... > > I suggested Wandora because it isn't a dead end, it's already very well > supported and "heavily integrated" with the sources that we would most > likely need to refer to in building any general purpose ontology. Ability > to import a lot of data right away from dynamically updated sources is > pretty important. > > Think back to Katrina and the Bush Administration "not knowing" there were > people in the AstroDome. When it had already been on TV and been updated in > Wikinews/Wikipedia... there's really no excuse for this kind of thing so not > planning for the integration of public data feeds is a serious error. > > Of course one has to verify such data but when several news organizations > are reporting it and you have to make *some* decision about where to go, > it's a good first clue. > > C > > > > Wandora is a very robust tool that runs on the desktop > > and integrates very > > > well with mediawiki. Heavily integrated with many > > ontology libraries and > > > data sources. > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.wandora.org/wandora/wiki/index.php?title=Download > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2009 23:08:47 UTC