- From: <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Renato Iannella" <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Cc: creed@opengeospatial.org, "Chamindra de Silva" <chamindra@opensource.lk>, "public-xg-eiif" <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
Reanato - Thanks. And yes, I agree with your modification to the standards paragraph. I have been stating for about two years that EDXL and related OASIS work is US centric and as such this will impact uptake outside the US. Regards Carl > > On 30 Jun 2009, at 07:09, creed@opengeospatial.org wrote: > >> Is it OK to share this with the OGC membership? > > Sure, and it is still a draft Final Report and more comments welcome... > >> The section is not a true reflection of the current state of affairs >> for >> standards that are used in the EM and related communities. > > We will update that paragraph to be clearer. The key point was that > some of the mentioned standards > (in the paragraph, not the WIKI) have not had broad international > appeal. > > This did not include OGC, which has. > > Cheers... Renato Iannella > NICTA > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 15:54:49 UTC