- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:17:27 +0100
- To: Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0904280517l6a7ce3e2sf7e3d08584fea494@mail.gmail.com>
Gary I have started collecting 'relationship sets' and discovered this paper a while back http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/lib/download/SAK02-TM.pdf a relevant example on page 5 /6 about nuclear test >> cause>>> earthquake (degree of certaintyxyz) this set of relations looks a bit different I would like to understand how obo relations match other relational sets, and how to combine them another puzzle to solve p On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross@gmail.com>wrote: > Paola > > > > An ontology needs some defined relations and so do any vocabulary > defintions. > > The table below is the “ontology” of core relations for use by OBO<http://obo.sourceforge.net/>Foundry (ontologies > http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#details). I can see using all but perhaps > the “derives from” relation in our vocabulary and ontology work. > > The set they have handles 3 types of “part” relations and has several > geospatial relations we need (e.g. located in, adjacent to) and handles > sequences (preceded by) and a way of showing aggregate events/actions (has > participant). We might at least standardize the way we use relations in > glossary definitions and point back to these as the standard definition. > > > > *Summary Table* > > *name * > > *transitive * > > *symmetric * > > *reflexive * > > *anti-symmetric * > > *documentation * > > is_a > > + > > > > + > > + > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:is_a%23OBO_REL:is_a> > > part_of > > + > > > > + > > + > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:part_of%23OBO_REL:part_of> > > integral_part_of > > + > > > > + > > + > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:integral_part_of%23OBO_REL:integral_part_of> > > proper_part_of > > + > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:proper_part_of%23OBO_REL:proper_part_of> > > located_in > > + > > > > + > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:located_in%23OBO_REL:located_in> > > contained_in > > > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:contained_in%23OBO_REL:contained_in> > > adjacent_to > > > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:adjacent_to%23OBO_REL:adjacent_to> > > transformation_of > > + > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:transformation_of%23OBO_REL:transformation_of> > > derives_from > > + > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:derives_from%23OBO_REL:derives_from> > > preceded_by > > + > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:preceded_by%23OBO_REL:preceded_by> > > has_participant > > > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:has_participant%23OBO_REL:has_participant> > > has_agent > > > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:has_agent%23OBO_REL:has_agent> > > instance_of > > > > > > > > > > View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:instance_of%23OBO_REL:instance_of> > > Of course this doesn't straighten out the issues of what to present about > ontology and voc in the final report, but it is at least a step on > standardization for some semantics. > > Gary Berg-Cross,Ph.D. > gbergcross@gmail.com > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross > SOCoP Executive Secretary > Principal, EM&I Semantic Technology > Potomac, MD > 301-762-5441 > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> (apol for array of emails, I am on discovery mode) >> >> >> also another example of recent work >> >> http://webkr.cs.vu.nl/slides/WebKR_Lecture7_2.pdf >> >> -- >> >> > > > -- > > > -- Paola Di Maio, ****************************************
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 12:18:10 UTC