Re: Standard ontological relations for our voc -leverating Obo relations

Gary

I have started collecting 'relationship sets' and discovered this paper a
while back

http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/lib/download/SAK02-TM.pdf

a relevant example on page 5 /6 about nuclear test >> cause>>> earthquake
(degree of certaintyxyz)

this set of relations looks a bit different

I would like to understand how obo relations match other relational sets,
and how to combine them

another puzzle to solve



p


On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross@gmail.com>wrote:

> Paola
>
>
>
> An ontology needs some defined relations and so do any vocabulary
> defintions.
>
> The table below is the “ontology” of core relations for use by OBO<http://obo.sourceforge.net/>Foundry (ontologies
> http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#details).  I can see using all but perhaps
> the “derives from” relation in our vocabulary and ontology work.
>
> The set they have handles 3 types of “part” relations and has several
> geospatial relations we need (e.g. located in, adjacent to) and handles
> sequences (preceded by) and a way of showing aggregate events/actions (has
> participant).  We might at least standardize the way we use relations in
> glossary definitions and point back to these as the standard definition.
>
>
>
> *Summary Table*
>
> *name *
>
> *transitive *
>
> *symmetric *
>
> *reflexive *
>
> *anti-symmetric *
>
> *documentation *
>
> is_a
>
> +
>
>
>
> +
>
> +
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:is_a%23OBO_REL:is_a>
>
> part_of
>
> +
>
>
>
> +
>
> +
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:part_of%23OBO_REL:part_of>
>
> integral_part_of
>
> +
>
>
>
> +
>
> +
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:integral_part_of%23OBO_REL:integral_part_of>
>
> proper_part_of
>
> +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:proper_part_of%23OBO_REL:proper_part_of>
>
> located_in
>
> +
>
>
>
> +
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:located_in%23OBO_REL:located_in>
>
> contained_in
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:contained_in%23OBO_REL:contained_in>
>
> adjacent_to
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:adjacent_to%23OBO_REL:adjacent_to>
>
> transformation_of
>
> +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:transformation_of%23OBO_REL:transformation_of>
>
> derives_from
>
> +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:derives_from%23OBO_REL:derives_from>
>
> preceded_by
>
> +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:preceded_by%23OBO_REL:preceded_by>
>
> has_participant
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:has_participant%23OBO_REL:has_participant>
>
> has_agent
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:has_agent%23OBO_REL:has_agent>
>
> instance_of
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View detailed summary<http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/#OBO_REL:instance_of%23OBO_REL:instance_of>
>
> Of course this doesn't straighten out the issues of what to present about
> ontology and voc in the final report, but it is at least a step on
> standardization for some semantics.
>
> Gary Berg-Cross,Ph.D.
> gbergcross@gmail.com
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross
> SOCoP Executive Secretary
> Principal, EM&I Semantic Technology
> Potomac, MD
> 301-762-5441
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> (apol for array of emails, I am on discovery mode)
>>
>>
>> also another example of recent work
>>
>> http://webkr.cs.vu.nl/slides/WebKR_Lecture7_2.pdf
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>


-- 
Paola Di Maio,
****************************************