- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:51:26 +0100
- To: Chamindra de Silva <chamindra@opensource.lk>
- Cc: public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0904180551r2c40b5cdn5a30a7e8001b8d7@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Chamindra I am following this line of thinking to devise a base methodology for the proposed approach, and define further the task - I think we need to see absolutely crystal clear as to what needs to be done to come up with the appropriate methodological suggestion. I am pretty sure there are established (read experimental) ways of identifying the semantic gap, while for the pragmatic gap we are at the very beginning of the curve. > > To me identifying the gap will involve working first through a use-case > like the "who is doing what where" problem to identify the base ontology. I dont see what I would call a gap there, (a gap would be perhaps mroe like identify who is NOT doing what where' , but maybe you can better suggest a method for what you mean > next we would identify (system to system) interop > standards that would intersect with the ontology. does the list that we already have on the wiki not satisfy that already? > What remain not covered by a interop standard is a interop gap. This tells > us where an > interop standard need to be developed to full cover the use-case. okay, so 'interoperability gap' = interoperability requirements - interoperability standards (assuming linearity) > > > Another sense of gap, is in what interop standards is implemented by > the range of systems that implement the 3W use-case. then we need a list of these, and possbly some ranking (of what systems are more in use) > Irrespective of > weather a interop standard exists, if it is hardly implemented in > systems than that too is an implementation gap. > ok > > By constraining the scope to a use-case we can make this a manageable > exercise to finish before our deadline. We just need to cover the 3W > area for our framework document and it will serve as an example for > the final report. > I think the semantic gap and pragmatic gaps are part of an interop gap , and that's as far as I can stretch my scope of work in the near future I ll be happy to assit you or others with the reminder of the task, as I do not feel it is in my immediate feel of competence/study enough will produce a few paragraphs to address the issue as discussed so far, and await further instructions on how to proceed for the rest i am hoping to recruit a few more people to assist with the voabulary definition part of the job P
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2009 12:52:06 UTC