Re: Borrowing some When and Where standards for EIIF

Gary -

The OGC Staff are having a set of teleconference calls with the OmniClass 
community to consider potential semantic enhancements to the Location 
elements in Table 49 - such as enhanced context for coordinate reference 
systems, altitude, and so forth. Doing so will insure greater compatibility 
(harmonization) with the expression of location in various OGC, ISO, OASIS 
(CAP and HAVE), and IETF RFCs (such as PIDF-LO) standards.

Cheers

Carl


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Berg-Cross" <gbergcross@gmail.com>
To: "public-xg-eiif" <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
Cc: <creed@opengeospatial.org>; "Chamindra de Silva" 
<chamindra@opensource.lk>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: Borrowing some When and Where standards for EIIF


OmniClass Table 49, Properties.
OmniClass is, in simple terms, a standard for organizing all
construction information. The concept for OmniClass is derived from
internationally-accepted standards that have been developed by the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the
International Construction Information Society (ICIS) subcommittees
and workgroups from the early-1990s to the present.  Attached are 2 of
 their fundamental properties from their table 49 – roughly for our
Where and When sections.

See http://www.omniclass.org/background.asp for a discussion of their
standards effort.


-- 
Gary Berg-Cross,Ph.D.
gbergcross@gmail.com 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross
SOCoP Executive Secretary
Principal, EM&I Semantic Technology
Potomac, MD
 301-762-5441

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM,  <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Carl,
> I dont think so far we have decided to constrain the scope, as our mission
> is purely explorative at this stage
> I would suggest you append any standards that you know of to the existing
> one on the wiki, with commentaries
> if you have alredy information and evaluation about their use
> thanks
> PDM
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:19 PM, <creed@opengeospatial.org> wrote:
>>
>> All -
>>
>> Was wondering about the "scope" of the standards (defacto, de-jure etc) 
>> in
>> the final report. There are numerous standards used in EM applications
>> that could be included beyond what is already listed. For example,
>> GeoRSS/AtomPUB is used in numerous alerting and warning applications. 
>> Then
>> there AIXM/GML for the sharing of aeronautical information between
>> authorities, authorities and airports, airports and authorities and so
>> forth. And there is all the work being done by NENA for the US Next
>> Generation 911 system, including an information model for sharing
>> geospatial content between and among local governments and PSAPS.
>> Definitely a controlled vocabulary in that model. There are many more,
>> which is why I ask the question.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> > This would be a good reference for our report. How exhaustive did you
>> > find
>> > his paper? scope of standards he covered?
>> >
>> > I have added these references to the final report, in the following
>> > section
>> > for now
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/wiki/EIIF_Final_Report#Existing_standards_and_technology
>> >
>> > chamindra de silva
>> > http://chamindra.googlepages.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Gary Berg-Cross
>> > <gbergcross@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Eli Rohn reported on "A Survey of Schema Standards and Portals for
>> >> Emergency Management and Collaboration" at ISCRAM 07
>> >>
>> >> Here are the schemas (not Portals) he reported on in Table 1:
>> >> Emergency Schemas and Portals
>> >>
>> >> ANML Advisory and Notification Markup Language facilitating emanation
>> >> of data relating to software vulnerabilities US Schema
>> >>
>> >> CAP Common Alerting Protocol to collect and relay instantaneously and
>> >> automatically all types of hazard warnings and reports locally,
>> >> regionally and nationally for input into a wide variety of
>> >> dissemination systems US Schema
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> EDXL Facilitate emergency information sharing and data exchange
>> >> across the local, state, tribal, national and non-governmental
>> >> organizations of different professions that provide emergency response
>> >> and management services
>> >> US Schema
>> >>
>> >> IEEE 1512
>> >> A family of standard messages for traffic incident management, public
>> >> safety, hazardous material incident, and management of entities
>> >> external to centers.
>> >> US Schema
>> >>
>> >> LGCL A controlled vocabulary for local government and community
>> >> resources categorized in a hierarchical structure under headings
>> >> familiar to citizens.
>> >> UK Schema
>> >>
>> >> IPSV The Integrated Public Sector Vocabulary is an 'encoding scheme'
>> >> for populating the e-Government Metadata Standard (e-GMS) subject
>> >> element of metadata.
>> >> UK Schema
>> >>
>> >> RWE Notification of Road Works and Highway related Events among local
>> >> and central government, emergency services and the media
>> >> UK Schema
>> >>
>> >> SDEP Street events Data Exchange Protocol
>> >> UK Schema
>> >>
>> >> HCCHE
>> >> A schema that enables electronic exchange of highway related inquiries
>> >> and problem reports received from the public.
>> >> UK Portal and Schema
>> >>
>> >> RTA
>> >> Facilitates the exchange of road traffic accident data between the
>> >> Compensation Recovery Unit and the National Health Service for the
>> >> recovery of insurance compensation to injured parties.
>> >> UK Portal and Schema
>> >>
>> >> Gary Berg-Cross,Ph.D.
>> >> gbergcross@gmail.com
>> >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross
>> >> SOCoP Executive Secretary
>> >> Principal, EM&I Semantic Technology
>> >> Potomac, MD
>> >> 301-762-5441
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Chamindra de Silva
>> >> <chamindra@opensource.lk> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:16 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Assessing Interoperability in Emergency Management Standards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=04494315
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Paola this would be a reference for the gap analysis we require.
>> >> >
>> >> > chamindra de silva
>> >> > http://chamindra.googlepages.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paola Di Maio,
> ****************************************
>
> Looking for champions
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sogKUx_q7ig&feature=related
>
>
> Vocamp Ibiza Vocamp.org
> 15-16 April
>
> Advances in semantic computing,
> Book Chapter Proposals Accepted
> http://www.tmrfindia.org/eseries/cfc-sc.html
>
> Taxonomy of fundamental Ontology
> http://www.galilean-library.org/manuscript.php?postid=77614
>
>
> IEEE/DEST 09 Collective Intelligence Track (deadline extended)
>
> i-Semantics 2009, 2 - 4 September 2009, Graz, Austria.
> www.i-semantics.tugraz.at
>
> SEMAPRO 2009, Malta
> http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/CfPSEMAPRO09.html
> **************************************************
> Mae Fah Luang Child Protection Project, Chiang Rai Thailand
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 21:18:06 UTC