- From: <donc@internode.on.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:34:05 +0930
- To: Tom Worthington <Tom.Worthington@tomw.net.au>, "Don Cameron" <donc@internode.on.net>, <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>, <public-xg-eiif-request@w3.org>
Thanks for the information on Tsunami warnings Tom, although I think if you read what I wrote previously you may find I did not in fact "dismiss non-legislated standards suggested by lay non-EM experts". To the contrary, I encourage such contributions and have participated in many public contributory sessions on EM over the years - Such input is of course to be encouraged and welcomed. It is also reasonable to expect such input to be weighted and assessed as appropriate. I do however believe (perhaps incorrectly?) this particular initiative has a well defined mission to create an ontology for the EM domain; and that at least at this point in time the mission does not include trying to reinvent the science of emergency management (noting EM is nowadays qualified and quantified by academic and other globally recognised certifications and accreditations). Tom EM moved from art to science quite a few years ago. If we were to try and reinvent EM we would surely never reach consensus and would likely drag this initiative to infinity. Also - I'm fairly certain we (as a diverse group of individuals) would not try to re-design the science of medicine should we choose to assist with medical ontological developments, nor would we for engineering ontological developments. I fail to see why EM is any different. There is an enormous body of science and knowledge on emergency management - IMO it would be foolhardy to discard or de-prioritise this knowledge for no more of a reason than personal preference or opinion of management activities during specific emergency incidents. It's a truism that people only remember (or cite) incidents that went poorly... instead of the Canberra fires you might consider focusing on the NSW Jan '94 fires; the Nyngen Floods (or current QLD flood disaster), the Pilliga Fire Disaster or any other of a myriad of disasters that were demonstrably well managed. I agree we should learn from our mistakes, but please remember it's equally important that we learn from our successes. Rgds, Don Cameron
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:04:20 UTC