- From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:27:40 -0700
- To: Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Cc: Joe Turner <joe@oampo.co.uk>, public-xg-audio@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 20:28:19 UTC
Yes, that's what I've been thinking as well. There's still the buffering/latency issue which will affect how near into the future it will be possible to schedule these types of events, but I suppose that's a given. Also, there could be pathological cases where there are many very short notes which aren't exactly at the same time, but close. Then they wouldn't be processed properly in the batch. But, with the proper kind of algorithm, maybe even these cases could be coalesced if great care were taken, and possibly at the cost of even greater buffering. Chris On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>wrote: > Implementation thought: > > I was thinking, if all JS nodes process sample batches in lock step, can > all active JS nodes be scheduled to run in sequence in a single thread > context switch, instead of context-switching once per node? > > ... . . . Joe > > *Joe Berkovitz* > President > Noteflight LLC > 160 Sidney St, Cambridge, MA 02139 > phone: +1 978 314 6271 > www.noteflight.com > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 20:28:19 UTC