That sounds fine, assuming I can call in. I don't think I'll be able to video conference that early. On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Alistair MacDonald <al@bocoup.com> wrote: > It appears that an earlier time would be better for our European members. I > propose we move the time to: 12pm EST, which is: 9am California, 5pm UK and > 6pm CET. > > How does that sound to everyone? > > Al > > > > > > On 06/10/2010 02:45 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> being one hour east of UK (at CET), I would also prefer the meeting being >> held earlier in the day than the proposed 3 pm ET. >> >> Br, >> Stefan >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xg-audio-request@w3.org [mailto: >> public-xg-audio-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Good >> Sent: den 9 juni 2010 06:02 >> To: public-xg-audio@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Getting Started >> >> My experience is that 11:00 or 12:00 pm ET works best for meetings that >> range from California to Europe (8 or 9 am PT / 5 or 6 pm CET). >> If we only go as far east as the UK, then 12:00 or 1:00 pm ET works. >> If we have Asian representatives too, then we probably will have to rotate >> times. >> >> Mondays at any of those times are good for me, with 12:00 pm ET preferred. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael Good >> Recordare LLC >> www.recordare.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Alistair MacDonald > Bocoup, LLC > http://bocoup.com > +1-617-379-2752 > +1-617-584-1420 > 319 A Street > Boston MA > 02210 > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 23:04:08 UTC