- From: Richard V Robinson <robinson@drizzle.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:48:00 -0800
- To: public-xg-audio@w3.org
Hi Michael, and all you others, My comment about notation capabilities in relation to audio production was merely response to what I read as an assertion that graphic representation "requires" audio support. Maybe I misinterpreted the original comment. Producing readable notation, all by itself, is an important thing to be able to do. In some contexts it might be okay for the audio producing element of a system to consist of humans who interpret graphics and operate noisemakers. I am personally acquainted with many humans who have invested years of training to be able to do just that very well. As a composer, I'm very interested in any and every means available to aid me in producing higher quality instructions for such people. Hence my interest in notation software. I don't disagree that it can be convenient for notation software to support some sort of playback. The discussion presented in your limit-scope paper suggests one example of a use case where support for diverse graphic representation is desirable, but audio capability would likely be an impediment if not an outright disaster: Producing scores for an ensemble in which readers of "standard" European notation are enlisted in a piece that also involves instrumentalists comfortable with an Asian cipher notation. If anyone on the list can point to software capable to do that, I'll have gotten my dime's worth from this exchange. ;-) thanks for your response, --dick--
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 06:48:27 UTC