- From: David Humphrey <David.Humphrey@senecac.on.ca>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:16 -0400
- To: public-xg-audio@w3.org
Hey, I was reading the minutes from today's meeting, and thought I should respond to some of what I read, in particular: ------------- Chris Rogers: I have noticed that Mozilla are pushing Data API in Firefox4. Al: I believe that is true. Chris Rogers: It will be exciting to see that people can play with these APIs. It might be akward that there are multiple APIs out there. eric_carlson: I agree with Chris, I think it's unfortunate. I assume that the API will be Mozilla prefixed. It's a shame that we've been making good progress and havn't had a chance to dicuss this. Al: Yes it is definitely prefexed with "moz" Chris Rogers: I think this may slow down the standardization process, perhaps adding complications. And I find it unusual that Dave Humphrey has not participated in the group. ---------- Mozilla is planning to take my patch for Firefox 4 (I've already tried to land it once, and will be trying again this week for beta 5). The API is an experimental Mozilla-only extension, and not meant to derail anything happening here--I was working on this stuff long before any of this was going on, and have simply pushed hard to see my work to completion. Whatever might come out of this process, I don't think this api is a negative blow to your work in any way (people working with me have already started porting your API to js on top of it). The people I've talked to see it as a chance to open the door to web developers scripting audio on the web. This goal, as well as the goals of this group, are the same, and getting a sense of what the web will do with audio data is what this experimental API hopes to achieve. Can it change in the future? Of course. Does Mozilla think this is the best and only way to do this? I don't speak for Mozilla, so I won't pretend to answer. I think some people confuse me for the maintainer of the audio/media stuff in Mozilla. I am not. I haven't been active in this group primarily due to time constraints, and also I've been relying on the fact that Corban has been involved (Corban and I talk daily, so I'm never far away from what's happening). But also, I'm not an audio expert, and frankly, the discussions here are often beyond me and my ability to usefully contribute. I'm a Mozilla contributor who has implemented an API that was designed by a bunch of people who are already on this list. I will say, on a personal note, and perhaps not surprisingly, that I favour the approach I've taken, which seeks to do as much as possible in JS, and to keep the API as small as possible. Philosophically, I wanted to make this API accessible to non-experts, and I think that this has been achieved. What would audio experts build for the web? I suppose that's what you guys are answering. Dave
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 17:53:46 UTC