Re: ACTION-2335: Work on creating a context attribute set

On `<model>`/`<instance>`:

- `ref`, `bind`, and `model` don't make sense
- `context` could make sense for AVTs
- noting that `class` only makes sense on `<model>` and `<instance>` as an
informational marker, or as a way to search for an element by class name,
but not for styling

This said, I could go either way for `context`: either not have it, or just
have `context` without the other attributes (`ref`, `bind`, and `model`).

-Erik


On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 4:29 AM Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
wrote:

> Following on from
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2023Jan/0015.html
>
> We decided to have three attribute sets:
>
> Common: attributes that are tru;y generic:
>
> anyAttribute
>
> id [not AVT]
>
> xml:lang
>
> class
>
> Context: attributes that affect binding and AVTs
>
> model
>
> context
>
> Binding:
>
> ref
>
> bind
>
> (nodeset)
>
> The plan would then be to add the Context group to all elements that carry
> Common, *except* those where it makes no sense: <model> <instance>.
>
> Note that since <model> and <instance> both carry foreign attributes, lang
> and class, which can all be AVTs, that they can no longer be addressed with
> @context. Are we OK with that?
>
> Steven
>
> On Friday 27 January 2023 16:14:54 (+01:00), XForms Users Community Group
> Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> > ACTION-2335: Work on creating a context attribute set
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2335
> >
> > Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
>
>