Re: ACTION-2255: Think more about properties on controls

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:50:07 +0200, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>  
wrote:

> All,
>
> I think it would be a reasonable step to define `relevant` and  
> `readonly` on controls as a first step.
>
> - they wouldn't influence the data model
> - they would combine with existing model MIPs if any
>
> That should be easy to spec.
>
> -Erik
While working on this, I think that 'required' is OK to add to this list  
too.

Agree?

Steven