- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:45:11 +0200
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <op.zjtu1ljgsmjzpq@steven-xps>
While preparing a proposal for embedded subforms this question arose again, and it occurred to me that a possible easy way of doing this is <submission method="xforms-echo" ... in which case @resource is ignored, but otherwise, it acts as normal. (In my proposal I use an addition xforms-* value for method="..", but I still need to think out the details before I send it and we can discuss it; hopefully we can discuss both points next week). Steven On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:12:26 +0200, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote: > We have that feature in our implementation with the `echo:` URL scheme: > > resource="echo:" > > It can be very useful indeed. > > -Erik > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Steven Pemberton > <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> I have a number of use cases where to be able to do them, I need a >> server that does nothing else than reflect the submitted data back. >> >> Examples: >> >> 1. Building an xhtml file up in an instance via a form, and then >> replacing the current form with the built-up file. >> >> 2. Copying all the (valid) data from one instance into another. >> >> 3. Looking at the data that has been created while I am developing a >> form (this I need the most). >> >> How difficult would it be for an implementation to support a mode of >> submission that did all the submission steps except for the actual >> sending the data over the wire, and >>then treat the submission data as >> if it were the response from the submission? >> >> Steven
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2018 12:45:44 UTC