W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > March 2018

Re: function/@override

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 09:14:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEVXO0bkcinUE=cd1ivzu_kTrnSh6c6QXqOHAXfdK_iDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
I suspect that the "yes" / "no" terminology is inspired by XSLT.

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote:

> I don't find any other place where booleans are "yes" or "no". I would
> suggest making this "true" or "false".
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl
> > wrote:
>
>> "override
>>  Optional string specifying if this function overrides previously
>> declared functions. The default value is yes."
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The
>> _function_Element
>>
>> I am assuming that the valid values are "yes" and "no", and will add that
>> to the definition.
>>
>> Steven
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 16:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:37:49 UTC