W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > March 2018

Re: 7.2.7 card-number type

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:19:28 +0100
To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.zgbwiqr0smjzpq@steven-xps>
Yes, sorry, I should have been clearer. Since our inbuilt types now now  
longer also accept empty string as a possible value since we fixed  
validation+required, I believe card-number should be [0-9]+ and not [0-9]*.

Steven

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:20:22 +0100, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>  
wrote:

> The regex has `[0-9]*` so clearly zero or more digits were intended.
>
> This was done before we fixed the validation to allow optional-but-empty  
> fields to be valid, and in that case having zero digits allowed  
> supporting optional fields. Just a >guess.
>
> -Erik
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Steven Pemberton  
> <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>> "7.2.7 card-number type
>>
>> This type represents identity, debit and credit card numbers; it is a  
>> pattern restriction on xs:string to zero or more digits (0 - 9)."
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#card-number_type
>>
>> Presumably this ought to read "one or more digits".
>>
>> Agree?
>>
>> Steven
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 12:20:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:37:49 UTC