- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:19:28 +0100
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 12:20:01 UTC
Yes, sorry, I should have been clearer. Since our inbuilt types now now longer also accept empty string as a possible value since we fixed validation+required, I believe card-number should be [0-9]+ and not [0-9]*. Steven On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:20:22 +0100, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote: > The regex has `[0-9]*` so clearly zero or more digits were intended. > > This was done before we fixed the validation to allow optional-but-empty > fields to be valid, and in that case having zero digits allowed > supporting optional fields. Just a >guess. > > -Erik > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Steven Pemberton > <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> "7.2.7 card-number type >> >> This type represents identity, debit and credit card numbers; it is a >> pattern restriction on xs:string to zero or more digits (0 - 9)." >> >> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#card-number_type >> >> Presumably this ought to read "one or more digits". >> >> Agree? >> >> Steven
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 12:20:01 UTC