- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:51:51 +0100
- To: public-xformsusers@w3.org, "XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
To summarise the current situation: Requirements To add the ability to be able to dispatch events into and out of an embedded XForms. Original proposal * Use a different control that models <dispatch/>, but is solely for embedding. To dispatch an event into an embedding, you use <signal name="event-name" control="embedding-control-id"/> To dispatch an event out of an embedding, you use <signal name="event-name"/> New proposal * Merge <signal/> into <dispatch/> To dispatch an event into an embedding, you use <dispatch name="event-name" control="embedding-control-id"/> The event goes to the first model of the embedded XForm To dispatch an event out of an embedding, you use <dispatch name="event-name"/> (The absence of @targetid or @control implies that it is dispatched to the embedder). The event goes to the <control/> element that caused the embedding. Steven On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:19:52 +0100, XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > ACTION-2207: Merge <signal/> into <dispatch/> > > https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2207 > > Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2018 11:52:37 UTC