- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:51:51 +0100
- To: public-xformsusers@w3.org, "XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
To summarise the current situation:
Requirements
To add the ability to be able to dispatch events into and out of an
embedded XForms.
Original proposal
* Use a different control that models <dispatch/>, but is solely for
embedding.
To dispatch an event into an embedding, you use
<signal name="event-name" control="embedding-control-id"/>
To dispatch an event out of an embedding, you use
<signal name="event-name"/>
New proposal
* Merge <signal/> into <dispatch/>
To dispatch an event into an embedding, you use
<dispatch name="event-name" control="embedding-control-id"/>
The event goes to the first model of the embedded XForm
To dispatch an event out of an embedding, you use
<dispatch name="event-name"/>
(The absence of @targetid or @control implies that it is dispatched to
the embedder).
The event goes to the <control/> element that caused the embedding.
Steven
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:19:52 +0100, XForms Users Community Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ACTION-2207: Merge <signal/> into <dispatch/>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2207
>
> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2018 11:52:37 UTC