W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Alert MIP Proposal

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:46:45 +0200
To: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, "michael odling-smee" <mike.odlingsmee@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.y16f37ghsmjzpq@steven-xps>

> Without wishing to dilute the discussion, I am not sure (but maybe  
> wrong) that the specification makes the interaction between @required  
> and @constraint clear. For instance if >I have an integer field that can  
> be blank, but if provided should be greater than 10 do I write:

This is a good point and exactly something we are discussing at the moment  
(thread starting at
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0003).

The only stumbling block we have at the moment is backwards-compatibility,  
but it is a topic of discussion.

Best wishes,

Steven
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2017 09:47:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 June 2017 09:47:20 UTC