- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:03:00 +0200
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 13:03:36 UTC
So I will define <reset/> <reset instance="id"/> along with <retain/> <retain instance="id"/> unless anyone has a better suggestion for the name of the retain action. Steven On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 22:03:21 +0200, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote: > I think it would make sense, yes. > > This is indirectly related, but I would also make sense to have a way to > be more explicit about when you want to *save* an instance for > subsequent "reset". A new action would >be needed for that though. > > -Erik > > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Steven Pemberton > <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> I have a use-case where I want to do a reset, but not on all instances. >> >> How hard would it be implementations to accept: >> >> <reset instance="id"/> >> >> to reset just one instance, and >> >> <reset/> >> >> to reset them all? >> >> Steven
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 13:03:36 UTC