- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 06:26:07 -0800
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 14:27:01 UTC
Thanks Liam, that makes sense. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 16:50 -0800, Erik Bruchez wrote: > > > [...] > > It would be nice in XForms if we had the same: > > > > <xf:repeat ref="E1"> > > ... evaluation of E2 using `size(), `position()`, and `last()` > > works > > ... > Note (from the peanut gallery) - the order of evaluation is not defined > in XPath and XSLT - they are not loops but definitions of mappings from > input ot output. > > Similarly in XPath 3, > for $i in 1 to 10 return $i * 3 > could be evaluated in parallel (although I doubt any implementation > would for something this simple, they actually do for more complex > things). > > Liam > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 14:27:01 UTC