- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:05:36 -0800
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:06:29 UTC
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > <instance> > <data xmlns=""> > <a>1</a> > <i/> > <x>1</x> > <x>2</x> > <x>3</x> > </data> > </instance> > <bind ref="i" calculate="../a"/> > <setvalue ref="a" ev:event="xforms-ready">123456789</setvalue> > ... > <repeat ref="x" indexref="i"> > <output ref="."/> > </repeat> > > > The problem here is that indexref is readonly. > > So when a (and therefore i) is set out of bounds of the repeat, processing > states that > * xforms-scroll-last is sent to the repeat, > * the repeat index is set to the size of the repeat collection > * therefore indexref is set to the value of the repeat index. > > But that last is not allowed, since i is readonly. There is a problem in general with `indexref` pointing to a readonly node. For example, the user might tab to repeat iteration 2 in the UI, and the repeat would attempt to store "2" via `indexref`, would fail, and so the index would fall back to "1". The advice might be to just not do that, or the behavior will be unexpected. -Erik
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:06:29 UTC