- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:39:16 +0100
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:39:56 UTC
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:20:20 +0100, Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> wrote: >> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_xforms-recalculate_Event >> >> "When a recalculate event begins, there will be a list L of one or more >> instance nodes whose values may have been changed" >> ... >> "All nodes in L, if any, and nodes that are computationally dependent >> on nodes in L must be recalculated." >> >> If L is "one or more" nodes then the "if any" in the second sentence is >> redundant. If the "if any" is right, then L should be "zero or more". > > Damn logic ;) I am not sure that there is a guarantee at the beginning > of a recalculate that at least one node has changed value. So I favor > the >"zero or more" option. I think you are right, in particular because the recalculate action can be initiated independently of the normal processing model. Steven > > -Erik
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:39:56 UTC