W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > November 2016

Re: The xforms-model-construct-done Event

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:21:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEVBJnKg=A7ANWLVZrE5EiLT_GVJGkp-N36ud3myy2ZXcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@marklogic.com>
Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
+1

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Philip Fennell <
Philip.Fennell@marklogic.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 14/11/2016 11:21, "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
>     This sections says
>
>     "If the control has a Single Item Binding, it is evaluated; if the
> result
>     is an empty sequence then the control is non-relevant.
>       Otherwise, the user interface for the control is created and
> initialized."
>
>     But since the control may well later become relevant, shouldn't this
> read:
>
>     "The user interface for the control is created and initialized.
>     If the control has a Single Item Binding, it is evaluated; if the
> result
>     is an empty sequence then the control is marked as non-relevant."?
>
>     Steven
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 17:22:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 14 November 2016 17:22:07 UTC