W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > November 2016

For ACTION-2087 - Write down his impmplementation's version of in-scope evaluation

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:37:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEWpOXD6hKAwdFaKWpU6DAkBxOV6z+pkzunhh=Q1V_YDtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>

(The following is just one step for ACTION-2087, and not an actual proposal

I found the message I was looking for from 2010:


It comes with an example:


The message had one reply from Alain, and a follow-up by myself:


That example and initial question had more to do with how `bind` would
interact with `model`.

However, in the ensuing meeting, we continued the discussion on how to
switch context when `model` is present:


I got an action item:

    Action 2010-05-19.1: Erik Bruchez to ask public-forms and www-forms
implementors - When you switch models, to what context do you switch? root
element or do you go back to the in-scope context? Please cite use cases
that support your decision.

That action item was never really completed and the purpose was to see what
implementors did and why.

Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2016 13:38:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:37:47 UTC