- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:05:23 -0700
- To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Cc: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com>, Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>, "<public-xformsusers@w3.org>" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF527CD980.9F4CD5D4-ON88257A09.00716BB6-88257A09.0073DB9F@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Nick, Oh, I now see and agree with your point that it wouldn't be necessary in those places to change from having special attributes to using binding attributes, since we changed over to having @context to Common instead of binding attributes. That being said, you raised the very interesting point that we hadn't discussed, which is the interplay between @model and @context. I think you're right that @model *must* go to Common as well. At that point, virtually all the changes described below must be made anyway, and it would make little sense to keep around ref/nodeset as a special attribute in a few places. Unfortunately, I won't be able to join next week's call, so I'd like to say by email that I support the change to put @model in Common, and all that it implies. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> To: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Cc: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com>, Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>, "<public-xformsusers@w3.org>" <public-xformsusers@w3.org> Date: 24/05/2012 11:33 PM Subject: Re: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) John, I thought that the last two resolutions/actions invalidated the previous resolutions/actions. If we still want to go forward with this I can make the changes. But we should put it back on the agenda then, or agree by e-mail. One thing, it might make sense to add model also to common attributes, because all XForms elements can now have XPath expressions (AVT's in attributes and context attribute). Kind regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com www.inventivedesigners.com On 24 May 2012, at 16:11, John Boyer wrote: Hi Nick and Leigh, It hasn't been done yet, but this action is to correspond with 1) removing ref/nodeset as special attributes from elements like header and bind 2) adding binding exceptions on header and bind if you bind to a model other than the containing one with a model or a bind attribute 3) removing model as special attribute from elements like var and rebuild/recalculate/revalidate/refresh 4) clarifying special handling of model attribute on these elements Also, Leigh, we were thinking that perhaps you were asking about whether context applied to only to single node bindings (versus also nodeset bindings) due to something specific you were reading that needed clarification, and if so, could you indicate what that is (unless it is now clear by the move of context attribute to the Common group). Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com > To: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com> Cc: "<public-xformsusers@w3.org>" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org> Date: 24/05/2012 12:41 AM Subject: Re: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) Leigh, Thank you for the great input! We've added @context to Common attributes because now that we have AVT's (and if, while attribute on actions) it makes indeed sense to have context everywhere, this was the intention anyway. (We also ensured that all XForms elements allow at least the common attributes). Could you elaborate a bit why you are thinking @context may not go on both single-node-binding and sequence-binding? It is intended to go everywhere. Kind regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com www.inventivedesigners.com <Mail Attachment.png><Mail Attachment.png><Mail Attachment.png> On 21 Apr 2012, at 01:15, Leigh L Klotz Jr wrote: There is still a distinction between single-node binding: @model, @ref, @bind and sequence-binding (formerly nodeset) binding @model, @ref, @nodeset, @bind In that single-node-binding is used on label, hjelp, hint, alert, message, item/value, item/copy, upload/filename, upload, output, output/mediatype, input, textarea, secret, select,select1, range, trigger, submit, load, setvalue, group, switch, and sequence-binding is used on itemset, insert, delete, repeat. Q: Does @context go on both single-node-binding and sequence-binding? Q: Also, does @context go in any of the following places, which currently have @nodeset, @ref, or @model: header, bind other actions (rebuild, dispatch, send, setfocus, etc) var Leigh. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Attachments
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 21:06:23 UTC