- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:04:29 -0400
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 18:03:18 UTC
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20100309/2381 > LC-2381: timeless's other comments > > Mez's summary: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2010Mar/0015.html > > **1** resolved to make no change > > **2** moot after clarification with timeless > > **3** return to previous UA state > > Resolved during call on 2010-03-31; see ISSUE-246. > > **4** danger messages for expired certificates > > Previously discussed in messages referenced here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2010Apr/0007.html > > See also ISSUE-198. I believe we're not planning to reopen that issue, > but would appreciate the chair's ruling on that point. > > **5** do not mix content and indicators > > Resolved during call on 2010-03-31; see ISSUE-247. > > **6** tab model / modal dialogs > > The comment assumes a different meaning for "modal" than the WG. We > resolved on 2010-03-31 to not change the text, but explain in our reply > to this comment. And what do I use to determine responses to (other) his editorial comments Thomas? Is there a diff? Were all accepted? Most? That's the part I don't have the content to respond to.
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 18:03:18 UTC