- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:47:47 +0200
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 26 Mar 2010, at 21:40, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > This is annoying. If I use http://delicious.com/or Google to save my > > bookmarks as a set, why shouldn't I allow them to provide a way to add > > pages I'm not currently at? Obviously I'd have to design it so that > > the user can review the content in some safe manner, but.... > > > > A competitor (Firefox for Mobile) offers an API, "Weave", which allows > > a web server (weave) to add URIs to the user's bookmark collection. We > > have already received customer requests demanding this feature. In > > reality, Weave doesn't quite act as web content, however, I don't > > think users care about the distinction. > > I believe Tyler had provided the attack pointer for this one. Anyone have it handy? Why would Weave even be subject to this spec? It's (for our purposes) an implementation detail of the browser. Not our business whether it uses HTTP or something else.
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:10:20 UTC