- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:42:11 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 20:41:47 UTC
Ah, I see. Yes that is clearer. Going once, going twice ... From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> To: Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 11/17/2009 08:36 AM Subject: Re: obscuring SCI Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org On 17 Nov 2009, at 14:16, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > Looking at this with perhaps slightly fresher eyes, is this "MUST > > prevent ... without user interactions" or is this about "interfaces > > that display security context information without user > > interactions"? This looks like it needs a bit of clean-up in the text. > > I'm not getting what you're getting at. Can you propose two versions that get at the difference? Perhaps this captures things better: > Web user agents MUST prevent web content from obscuring, hiding, or disabling user interfaces that display security context information, except in response to a user interaction.
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 20:41:47 UTC