- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:16:34 +0200
- To: WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
The current editor's draft has the following about the relationship of the work product to the requirements document: > This specification comes with two companion documents: [WSC- > USECASES] documents the initial assumptions of the scope of this > specification. It also includes an initial set of use cases the > Working Group discussed. [WSC-THREATS] documents the Working Group's > initial threat analysis. This document is based on current best > practices in deployed web user agents, and covers the use cases and > threats in those documents to that extent. > -- http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#Overview That's a little too opaque for my taste, in particular when looking through sections 9 and 10 of the use case note: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-wsc-usecases-20080306/#problems Problems with the status quo http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-wsc-usecases-20080306/#process Process I'd expect that the transition call to CR will involve questions about how the wsc-ui document relates to these sections, and we'd better have more than one sentence in the Overview section as an answer to that. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 08:17:07 UTC