- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:28:57 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF578079D3.1D235972-ON85257543.0075E61F-85257543.00760205@LocalDomain>
I think that I've always assumed it would be all of it. I don't have a
model for thinking about splitting it, and whether that would be good or
bad. So my inclination is to leave the question unaddressed.
Does someone want to argue differently, and/or put up a straw proposal?
Mez
From:
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
To:
Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus
Cc:
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:
01/19/2009 05:58 AM
Subject:
Re: ISSUE-217 Clarify whether identity signal is in EITHER primary or
secondary chrome, or does it span BOTH, and if BOTH how does it affect
the text
If I recall the issue correctly, the question was whether a conforming
user agent needs to:
- show the identity signal (and all of it) in primary chrome
- show the identity signal (and all of it) in secondary chrome
- can combine some pieces of primary and secondary chrome to show all
that information
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
On 16 Jan 2009, at 23:41, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
>
> Can anyone wax poetic on what the issues are in this issue? I just
> cannot remember, so cannot frame a reasonable proposal.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/217
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 21:29:38 UTC