- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:28:57 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF578079D3.1D235972-ON85257543.0075E61F-85257543.00760205@LocalDomain>
I think that I've always assumed it would be all of it. I don't have a model for thinking about splitting it, and whether that would be good or bad. So my inclination is to leave the question unaddressed. Does someone want to argue differently, and/or put up a straw proposal? Mez From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> To: Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Date: 01/19/2009 05:58 AM Subject: Re: ISSUE-217 Clarify whether identity signal is in EITHER primary or secondary chrome, or does it span BOTH, and if BOTH how does it affect the text If I recall the issue correctly, the question was whether a conforming user agent needs to: - show the identity signal (and all of it) in primary chrome - show the identity signal (and all of it) in secondary chrome - can combine some pieces of primary and secondary chrome to show all that information -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 16 Jan 2009, at 23:41, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > Can anyone wax poetic on what the issues are in this issue? I just > cannot remember, so cannot frame a reasonable proposal. > > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/217 > >
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 21:29:38 UTC