- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:57 -0800
- To: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>, Tyler Close <tyler.close@hp.com>
On 12 Jan 2009, at 15:23, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > > code> <bibref ref="ref-effective"/>. Implementations that use > such > > > suffixes for other security decisions (e.g., to determine the > > > shortest possible suffix that <code>document.location.href</code> > > > can be shortened to) should use the same mechanism to determine > the > > > suffix to which a petname can be bound. > > A nit, but do we want to avoid "should" as a natural language term? > In which case, would we say "are encouraged to"? Good catch. I was a bit reluctant to put a normative SHOULD into something that's labelled a Note. I guess I could go either way on this one.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 00:24:05 UTC