Thursday, 29 January 2009
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-28
- RE: Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- RE: Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- Re: ACTION-565: Updated SOTD
Wednesday, 28 January 2009
- Re: ACTION-565: Updated SOTD
- ACTION-565: Updated SOTD
- Re: Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- RE: Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- Re: Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- ACTION-509 Cross-frame scripting notes for "Security Considerations" section
- Proposed answer to MWBP WG (ACTION-566)
- ACTION-534 7.4.2 replacement text
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
- Re: ACTION-562: Text on sections for folks with PKI knowledge and UI
- Re: ACTION-562: Text on sections for folks with PKI knowledge and UI
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-28
Monday, 26 January 2009
Friday, 23 January 2009
- Re: Seeking advice on security best practice
- Re: Seeking advice on security best practice
- Re: Seeking advice on security best practice
- Re: Seeking advice on security best practice
Thursday, 22 January 2009
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-21
- RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-21
Tuesday, 20 January 2009
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-21
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-21
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-21
Monday, 19 January 2009
- Re: ISSUE-217 Clarify whether identity signal is in EITHER primary or secondary chrome, or does it span BOTH, and if BOTH how does it affect the text
- Re: ISSUE-217 Clarify whether identity signal is in EITHER primary or secondary chrome, or does it span BOTH, and if BOTH how does it affect the text
Friday, 16 January 2009
- ISSUE-217 Clarify whether identity signal is in EITHER primary or secondary chrome, or does it span BOTH, and if BOTH how does it affect the text
- Re: Issues that do not apply to wsc-ui
- Re: Issues that do not apply to wsc-ui
- Re: Issues that do not apply to wsc-ui
- Issues that do not apply to wsc-ui
- Re: ISSUE-215 Clarify "positive form of identity" language in 6.1.1
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
Tuesday, 13 January 2009
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-14
- Re: ACTION-555: Proposed change to petnames
Monday, 12 January 2009
- Re: ACTION-555: Proposed change to petnames
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-14
- Re: ACTION-554: updated intro text
Sunday, 11 January 2009
- Updated editor's draft available
- ACTION-555: Proposed change to petnames
- ACTION-554: updated intro text
Friday, 9 January 2009
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
- Re: Editorial Last Call Comment: RFC 3280 is obseleted ( LC-2056)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-07
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2009-01-07
- Fwd: <keygen>
Friday, 2 January 2009
- LC-2094 needs your kind attention
- ACTION-532 Write preamble which sets expectations for UI designers, resolves Conformance/Guidelines debate, ends world hunger
- LC-2129 is ready for review
- LC-2095 is ready for review
- LC-2088
- reference for petname concept?
- ACTION-517: Check EV expectations for subjectAltName
- LC-2057 - ready for review
- LC-2092 - ready for review
- ISSUE-215 Clarify "positive form of identity" language in 6.1.1
- LC-2087 - is there really an action item for this?
- LC-2086 - resolution implemented?
- LC-2058 response ready for review
- LC-2055 - response ready for review
- LC-2059 - ready for review
- Fw: Editorial Last Call Comment: RFC 3280 is obseleted ( LC-2056)
- Re: ACTION-540/ISSUE-220: Clarify "Whether the site content was authenticated"
- Re: ACTION-539/ISSUE-219: Clarify in 6.2 that other sources means places other than just security indicators
- Re: ACTION-538: Draft proposals for 6.2.G