Re: ACTION-509 Cross-frame scripting notes for "Security Considerations" section

Sold. Consensus declared. 

I'll create an editorial action for Thomas. Anil, feel free to grab it if 
its more appropriate. 






From:
Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus
To:
"Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc:
"public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
02/09/2009 08:08 AM
Subject:
Re: ACTION-509 Cross-frame scripting notes for "Security Considerations" 
section
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org



> >>> Thanks Tyler. I get what you're getting at, but am
> >> struggling with the
> >>> text. I've moved a bit around and tried to be a bit more
> >> explicit. I
> >>> like this better; other opinions? :
> >>
> >> I think either variant of the text is fine.
> >
> > Either variant is fine with me as well.
> 
> Let's do a distributed coin toss, then. ;-)

My coin likes my variant :-)

Going once, going twice....