Re: ISSUE-112 Conformance models for usability?

Then tell us where in xit, and make a good issue/proposal. 

          Mez





From:
"Ian Fette" <ifette@google.com>
To:
"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc:
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:
03/28/2008 01:42 PM
Subject:
Re: ISSUE-112 Conformance models for usability?



Is it the case that nothing in XIT is subjective to user interpretation? 
Have we gotten rid of all the language like "Areas designed or intended to 
convey trust"? Unless we're at a point where a person who knows nothing 
about the browser could go down a checklist and say "Yup, Nope" I think 
this issue is still valid.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko <
Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> wrote:

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/112

We've got no proposal on the table for this one, and nothing in xit that 
needs resolution of this. Unless someone turns this into a "good" issue, 
I'm closing it.

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/WriteGoodIssue