Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit]

Since I have put in the acknowledgements section into xit, I closed the 
corresponding action ACTION-402.

We have decided to nail the ISSUE-188 at the f2f in Oslo.

Addition to the ack section will of course be a work in progress.

Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2008-03-24 10:20:25 -0400, Johnathan Nightingale wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, I dunno if the w3c has clear rules about this kind of
>> thing, 
> 
> None that I'd know of, and up to the group as a whole to decide.
> 
>> but I consider it sort of an over-limiting process too.  I don't
>> know, for instance, if Ian F. has literal text in the draft or
>> not, but I'd say he's been an active contributor, worthy of
>> acknowledgement regardless.
> 
> Stephen wrote:
> 
>>> My suggestion: go back through the list and minutes and decide
>>> between editor/chair/team who to list & deal with it if problems
>>> arise.
> 
> +1

Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 16:42:12 UTC