- From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:17:40 -0400
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 14:18:32 UTC
On 25-Mar-08, at 7:57 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> 7.6) Internal inconsistency on logotype displays, as called out in
> comments.
> In 6.1.2:
> Logotypes derived from certificates SHOULD NOT be rendered, unless
> the certificate used is an augmented assurance certificate.
> In 5.1.5:
> Otherwise, when the logotype information is derived from a validated
> certificate, then the issuer logotype MUST be rendered, if present.
> Poll -
> a) remove the line from 5.1.5
> b) remove the line from 6.1.2
> c) remove both
I suspect that the intent of 6.1.2 is to say:
_Subject_ logotypes derived from ....
That is, that we SHOULD NOT render a logotype we can't trust. We
implicitly trust the issuer logotype, which is what 5.1.5 is getting
at. I think that with that (nearly editorial) change, there isn't any
inconsistency.
Cheers,
Johnathan
---
Johnathan Nightingale
Human Shield
johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 14:18:32 UTC