- From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:17:40 -0400
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 14:18:32 UTC
On 25-Mar-08, at 7:57 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > 7.6) Internal inconsistency on logotype displays, as called out in > comments. > In 6.1.2: > Logotypes derived from certificates SHOULD NOT be rendered, unless > the certificate used is an augmented assurance certificate. > In 5.1.5: > Otherwise, when the logotype information is derived from a validated > certificate, then the issuer logotype MUST be rendered, if present. > Poll - > a) remove the line from 5.1.5 > b) remove the line from 6.1.2 > c) remove both I suspect that the intent of 6.1.2 is to say: _Subject_ logotypes derived from .... That is, that we SHOULD NOT render a logotype we can't trust. We implicitly trust the issuer logotype, which is what 5.1.5 is getting at. I think that with that (nearly editorial) change, there isn't any inconsistency. Cheers, Johnathan --- Johnathan Nightingale Human Shield johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 14:18:32 UTC